Public evidence metadata ยท SEM-EVIDENCE-0022

Quantifying Binder Loss in Silica Filled Underfill by EDS Mass Balance

When underfill turns white and chalky, an elemental comparison is only part of the explanation. In SEM Lab Case 3139, we extended quantitative EDS into an engineering mass balance to compare degraded epoxy-silica underfill with a control sample. The fitted silica fraction increased from 16.8 to 29.5 vol%, while the binder-to-silica volume ratio fell from 4.96 to 2.39. Using silica as a nonvolatile internal reference, this indicates approximately 52% less binder volume per unit silica in the degraded material. The paper connects that result with the observed chalking, cracking, and flaking, and explains the stoichiometry, density assumptions, and limits of the calculation. The result is a localized composition estimate, not a direct measurement of bulk shrinkage or proof of a specific cure defect.

Evidence coverage

Failure modes

Binder loss, shrinkage, cracking, chalking, and flaking.

Materials

Epoxy-silica sensor underfill.

Analytical methods

Optical microscopy, SEM/EDS, and stoichiometric mass balance.